Weapon Enchantment: Never Miss

Please use carefully and respect the copyrights of the works you convert by placing the appropriate information on your documents.

Moderators: PEG Jodi, The Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Clint
Site Admin
Posts: 19833
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:28 pm

#21 Postby Clint » Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:46 am

cpk666 wrote:Your calculations seem to assume that Beta is just making a single normal attack each round. When I run the simulations for a variety of tactical choices, here is what I get:

2 fighters all traits d6, shortsword & +3 armor, Alpha has Never Miss Sword


He's also using d8 values instead of d6 which I think is more "accurate," especially since a +3 Armor on a d6 Strength character is highly unlikely
(not to mention having a Never Miss sword).

Also, are you still running your sims as a miss only counting as a normal hit with no Called Shot bonus?

If so, then tactically there's no real advantage to taking that penalty as there was before. In fact without that bonus, I think the preferable tactic would be to multi-action. A miss is still a hit, so the penalty to attack isn't as limiting as it is otherwise.

One option would be to Full Defense with a second weapon. Heck, the "second" weapon could be in the main hand while the Never Miss sword takes the -2 penalty for offhand (since it will hit barring a critical failure). Might not help often, but about every 1 in 4 or 5 actions Parry will be higher (about double that if used with Two-Fisted).

Another would be a Trick or Test of Will. The primary goal here is to go for the Shaken since even at half damage that might translate to a wound. And of course a normal success doesn't "cost" anything since it negates the multi-action penalty on the attack while a failure just makes half damage slightly more likely than full.

One thing I wouldn't do with the Never Miss weapon is Wild Attack. There's little reason to increase the chance to hit when a miss will hit anyway even if only for half damage, and when the cost of the -2 Parry is factored in, it's even less appealing.

Honestly, what a character with this weapon wants to do is decrease his chance to be hit as much as possible and let his "misses" eventually nickel and dime his opponent down.

Putting that all together, the character should likely use a shield for the bonus to Parry and then perhaps multi-action in a shield bash/Push (which likely wouldn't suffer offhand penalties anyway).
Clint Black
Savage Worlds Core Rules Brand Manager

www.peginc.com

User avatar
Zadmar
Legendary
Posts: 3165
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 8:59 am
Location: Munich
Contact:

#22 Postby Zadmar » Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:48 am

To simulate Rapid Attack, set the number of attacks to 3, reduce the parry modifier by 2, and reduce the attack bonus by 4.

cpk666
Veteran
Posts: 813
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 11:22 pm
Location: Atlanta West, GA

#23 Postby cpk666 » Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:23 am

Okay, let me try this again now that I understand the program a bit better.

2 fighters all traits d8, longsword, +3 armor & shield, Alpha has Never Miss Sword

Single Attack each
Alpha wins:58%

Alpha wild attacks
Alpha wins: 69%

Beta wild attack
Alpha wins: 38%

Both wild attack
Alpha wins: 51%

Alpha attacks for head, Beta wild attacks
Alpha wins: 28%

Alpha wild attacks for head, Beta wild attacks
Alpha wins: 36%

Alpha attacks for eyeslit, Beta wild attacks
Alpha wins: 55%

Alpha wild attacks for eyeslit, Beta wild attacks
Alpha wins: 53%

... I'll simulate the rapid attacks in a bit.

CK
Since this is my post, please understand that the thoughts expressed in it are my opinion.

"Tact is just not saying true stuff. I'll pass."--Cordelia Chase

cpk666
Veteran
Posts: 813
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 11:22 pm
Location: Atlanta West, GA

#24 Postby cpk666 » Tue Sep 11, 2012 11:18 am

2 fighters all traits d8, longsword, +3 armor & shield, Alpha has Never Miss Sword

Both rapid attack
Alpha wins:68%

Alpha wild rapid attacks, Beta rapid attacks
Alpha wins: 75%

Alpha rapid attacks, Beta wild rapid attacks
Alpha wins: 46%

Both wild rapid attack
Alpha wins: 55%

Alpha rapid attacks for head, Beta wild rapid attacks
Alpha wins: 48%

Alpha wild rapid attacks for head, Beta wild rapid attacks
Alpha wins: 46%

Alpha rapid attacks for eyeslit, Beta wild rapid attacks
Alpha wins: 80%

Alpha wild rapid attacks for eyeslit, Beta wild rapid attacks
Alpha wins: 74%

So does this make the Never Miss weapon too powerful? I'm no longer sure how to even answer that.

CK
Since this is my post, please understand that the thoughts expressed in it are my opinion.



"Tact is just not saying true stuff. I'll pass."--Cordelia Chase

cpk666
Veteran
Posts: 813
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 11:22 pm
Location: Atlanta West, GA

#25 Postby cpk666 » Tue Sep 11, 2012 5:05 pm

Ran some simulations using weapons of differing magical qualities:

Image

The "never miss" longsword seems comparable to the +2/+2 or the +3 to hit longswords.

CK
Since this is my post, please understand that the thoughts expressed in it are my opinion.



"Tact is just not saying true stuff. I'll pass."--Cordelia Chase


Return to “SW Home-brew Settings & Conversions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest